Do you provide CLE credit?

We do not currently provide formal CLE credit. We provide a Certificate of Technical Systems Completion for your firm's compliance files immediately following the Zoom session. Some jurisdictions may accept this for ethics or professional responsibility credit; please check with your state bar.

Why is technical training mandatory for sovereign deployments?

Because software is only half the battle. If an associate bypasses your secure workspace and pastes an unredacted deal sheet into a standard public browser, your technical perimeter hasn't failed, your operational discipline has. Our Zoom sessions ensure your entire team understands the difference between probabilistic guesswork and deterministic verification, reinforcing code-enforced safeguards into their daily habits.

Does professional liability insurance cover legal AI mishaps?

Many firms assume E&O or CGL policies cover AI-related errors. Standard carriers are embedding ISO endorsements CG 40 47 and CG 40 48 that can strip third-party AI liability on renewal. Without an auditable chain of custody from AI outputs to court records, firms may self-insure malpractice and sanctions risk. Course 1 maps NIST AI RMF governance; Course 2 builds secure daily practice.

Stop Your Legal AI Purchase from Meeting the Same Fate as a New Year’s Gym Membership.

Most firms invest heavily in legal tech, install it, and watch it collect digital dust. Technology adoption isn’t a procurement problem, it’s an operational problem.

Our structured engagements and interactive workshops bridge software capability and daily staff execution, transforming unpredictable, probabilistic models into a standardized, compliant, and highly protective firm asset.

RISK BRIEFING: ISO ENDORSEMENTS CG 40 47 & CG 40 48

The “Silent AI” Insurance Blind Spot

Many law firms and corporate legal departments assume their traditional Professional Liability (E&O) or Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies cover AI-related mishaps. They do not.

The insurance market is undergoing a rapid, aggressive correction. Standard carriers are actively embedding rigid new ISO exclusions, specifically endorsements CG 40 47 and CG 40 48, that quietly strip out third-party AI liability and hallucination coverage upon policy renewal.

If your firm hasn’t established an unchallengeable, auditable path from your AI outputs back to primary court records, you are likely self-insuring against malpractice, defamation, and bar sanction risks without knowing it. Our frameworks are designed to resolve this exposure before your next underwriting cycle.

AI Readiness, Governance & Implementation Frameworks

All engagements are structured as transparent flat fees. Zero ongoing software subscriptions.

$500 flat fee

1. AI Snapshot & Risk Brief

A low-friction diagnostic designed for firms that need fast clarity on where AI is already creeping into their practice and where the immediate compliance gaps sit.

Deliverable: A 30-minute leadership readout featuring 3 prioritized, immediate risk-mitigation recommendations.
Value: Immediate clarity on where client data is leaving your environment and how to secure the perimeter before your next insurance renewal.
Fee: $500 flat fee.

Best for: Small to mid-size firms or practice groups identifying shadow AI exposures.

Included: Short intake questionnaire, up to 5 practitioner interviews (30 mins each), a manual firm-wide AI use snapshot, and a 2–4 page executive risk brief.

Email to Schedule a Diagnostic →

Custom pricing

2. AI Governance & Shadow AI Assessment

A deep operational dive for firms facing client data scrutiny, evolving panel counsel guidelines, or leadership teams preparing for structural AI rollouts.

Deliverable: A formal AI Policy Framework, target governance recommendations, and a long-term implementation roadmap.
Value: A robust, board-ready governance artifact providing a clear regulatory defense and practical operational next steps.
Fee: Custom pricing based on firm size and practice complexity.

Best for: Firms with active AI usage that require a defensible, documented compliance record.

Included: Comprehensive multi-department interviews, complete Shadow AI mapping, tool and workflow review, legacy policy analysis, and a structured AI Risk Register.

Request an Assessment Consultation →

Custom implementation

3. Sovereign AI Setup & Deterministic Spine Implementation

A comprehensive enterprise engineering engagement that translates abstract AI policies into working, ironclad technical infrastructure that your firm entirely owns.

Deliverable: A living, single-tenant workspace with tamper-evident audit trail logging, complete workflow design, customized practitioner training, and active rollout support.
Value: A fully hardened, operational system that eliminates third-party SaaS risk, dynamically mitigates shadow AI, and generates mathematical evidence of active human supervision for courts and insurers.
Fee: Custom implementation pricing.

Best for: Forward-thinking litigation firms ready to turn AI into a permanent competitive advantage without data retention or third-party SaaS dependency.

Included: End-to-end deployment planning, local/single-tenant container configuration, edge data redaction layers (via Microsoft Presidio), deterministic verification layers, and policy-as-code enforcement (via ICME Labs’ Preflight proxy).

Schedule a System Architecture Briefing →

Interactive Group Workshops

For firms looking to onboard teams or train leadership on specific open-source or model frameworks.

$3,500 to $4,500 per firm

Course 1: Defeating Shadow AI & Governance via NIST AI RMF

An executive workshop that maps the NIST AI Risk Management Framework onto your firm’s active litigation workflows.

Target: Managing partners, GCs, CCOs, risk/ethics committees
Firm size: 10 to 150 lawyers
Format: Live interactive session with target pre-work

Up to 25 lawyers: $3,500 | 26 to 150 lawyers: $4,500.

Email to Schedule Course 1 →

$3,500 to $5,000 per workshop

Course 2: Secure Desktop Operations with Claude for Legal

A hands-on technical lab where practitioners master safe, efficient daily file execution.

Target: Litigation practice group chairs, senior associates, paralegal managers, KM leads
Firm size: 10 to 75 lawyers
Format: Dynamic lab with workspace configuration guidance and quick-reference sheets

$3,500 to $5,000 per workshop depending on scope and group count.

Email to Schedule Course 2 →

How Governance Fits the Technical Tracks

If your people are disciplined, tech makes them better. If they’re not, tech just makes the mess faster.

Open-Source Workspace (Basic Cockpit)

Stands up your sovereign drafting cockpit. Pair with Course 1 for leadership guardrails and Framework 1 for initial baseline perimeter checks.

Open-Source Workspace (Cryptographic Fortress)

Adds Preflight policy-as-code and tamper-evident audit receipts. Fits seamlessly with Framework 2 or 3 to build a continuous, audit-ready loop that satisfies insurance underwriters.

Claude for Legal (Assisted Installation)

Pairs naturally with Course 2 for rapid practitioner onboarding and Framework 1 to stamp out hidden consumer-grade shadow AI usage.

Advisory & ongoing governance

Claude Professional Package (Fractional AI Lead)

For firms seeking continuous governance oversight without the financial overhead of a full-time executive hire.

Target: MPs, GCs, COOs, and CISOs seeking sustained risk mitigation
Scope: Design and maintain firm playbooks, audit high-risk workflows, tune gateway policies, provide ongoing office hours, and deliver automated compliance metrics

$8,000–$12,000 initialization setup + $3,000–$6,000/mo ongoing retainer

Tiered based on firm size and deployed workspace stack.

Discuss a Fractional AI Lead Engagement →

FAQ

Can your training help stop lawyers from pasting data into consumer versions of ChatGPT/Claude?

Yes. This is the core focus of Framework 1 (AI Snapshot) and Course 1 (Defeating Shadow AI). Deploying standalone apps without a coherent infrastructure layer creates massive operational liabilities. We train your leadership to enforce a unified system boundary so your team operates under a single, documented, and auditable workflow.

Do you provide Continuing Legal Education (CLE) credits?

We do not currently provide formal CLE credit. We provide a Certificate of Technical Systems Completion for your firm’s compliance files immediately following the session. Some jurisdictions accept this for ethics or professional responsibility credit; please check with your state bar registry.

Why focus on operational training if the software itself is secure?

Because software is only half the battle. If an associate bypasses your secure workspace and pastes an unredacted transaction sheet into a standard public browser, your technical perimeter hasn’t failed, your operational discipline has. Our frameworks ensure your entire team understands the difference between probabilistic guesswork and deterministic verification.

Is Rule26 AI responsible for our final legal work product or filings?

Our training teaches practical technical systems engineering skills, risk-minimization workflows, and automated data governance frameworks. While we engineer the technical risk-reduction infrastructure, your firm remains entirely responsible for its independent professional judgment and final court filings.

Does Rule26 AI offer legal counsel or insurance coverage opinions?

We are not attorneys and do not provide legal advice. Our training and implementation services teach technical engineering skills and risk-reduction infrastructure. Your firm retains full responsibility for all legal judgment, rule compliance, and insurance policies.